Tuesday, May 02, 2006
Having watched these few episodes of "Superband", I feel that the production team made a mistake when they set the judges' scores to take only 30%, while the rest goes to popularity votes. By doing so, the program has since lost a few good and promising bands, while weaker bands survived. If this scenario is going to go on, I fear that the program will start to lose audience.
The recent 2 episodes (including today's), I believe, left alot of people in shock. The Group Which I tik No IMPROVEMENT, which performed way below par managed to survive the competition due to votes?! The judges have given them ample advices and chances to improve, but they have not made the slightest bit of improvement, only deprovement. If we were to base purely on the scores given out by the judges, it is obvious that Tis GROUP does not possess any quality to be a band. Their existence will only rob the chances of better and higher quality bands away from them.
The Group, if any of your members are reading this, just a word of advice. Seek the production company's permission to step down from the competition. Due to your "resilience" and "perserverance", you have caused better bands to lose their chance of performing on stage. Don't you feel ashamed and guilty to still be in the competition?
the only grp which i see almost nil improvement
I hope their voters can really wake up. This is really an insult to the competition.
I'm fine with having them around as a joke - give me a laugh
every Mon nite - but I really feel sad for the teams that never
got in at their expense.
I really can't stand it anymore.
They make it again ???!!!
What kinda of competition is this ?Obviously there is a flaw in the scoring system - financial seems to be the key scoring point here.many talented group have been eliminated...so count yourselves to be lucky...seeing you guys braving through rounds and rounds really upset me. it means more and more better or even pro-like bands are being eliminated
I miss Priscilla <333 ... 12:00 PM